1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 146 A.D.3d
  5. 146 A.D.3d 450 (2017)
 

RINGEL v. ROGOSNITZKY

2652, 311906/07.

146 A.D.3d 450 (2017)

2017 NY Slip Op 00081

43 N.Y.S.3d 751

CHANA RINGEL, Respondent, v. BINYOMIN ROGOSNITZKY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 5, 2017.

Contrary to defendant's contention, the court was not required to hold a hearing on plaintiff's motion, since defendant presented no evidence that raised triable issues of fact (see Rubin v Rubin, 134 A.D.3d 572 [1st Dept 2015]; Shoshanah B. v Lela G., 140 A.D.3d 603, 606 [1st Dept 2016]). Nor did he make an evidentiary showing that plaintiff's decision was not in the child's best interests...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases