1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 144 A.D.3d
  5. 144 A.D.3d 553 (2016)
 

BARDACH v. WEBER

2249, 101661/12.

144 A.D.3d 553 (2016)

2016 NY Slip Op 07847

42 N.Y.S.3d 11

JORDAN BARDACH et al., Appellants, v. MATTHEW G. WEBER et al., Defendants, and CITRIN COOPERMAN & COMPANY, LLP, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided November 22, 2016.

The record fails to demonstrate as a matter of law that defendant Weber did not have apparent authority to enter into the transactions at issue (see F.D.I.C. v Providence Coll., 115 F.3d 136, 140 [2d Cir 1997]; Restatement [Second] of Agency § 27). Defendant Citrin, a full-service accounting firm, made Weber a partner. The services that Weber purported to perform for plaintiffs were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases