Assuming defendant's challenge to the court's receipt of additional direct testimony at a suppression hearing was preserved, we find that the hearing court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the People to ask additional questions on direct examination of a police witness after they stated that they had no further questions, because the court had not yet ruled on the suppression motion (see People v Gnesin,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. LEE
2053, 1087/13.
143 A.D.3d 643 (2016)
2016 NY Slip Op 07085
40 N.Y.S.3d 90
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID LEE, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 27, 2016.
Decided October 27, 2016.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.