The court properly denied defendant's motion to set aside the verdict based on a Rosario violation, consisting of an undisclosed document, discovered after the verdict but before sentencing. The motion was not cognizable under CPL 330.30 (1) because such a motion is limited to grounds appearing in the record (see People v Wolf,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SATLIN
1760, 4648/13.
142 A.D.3d 920 (2016)
37 N.Y.S.3d 885
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARI SATLIN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 29, 2016.
Decided September 29, 2016.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.