McMANUS v. CITY OF NEW YORK

1756, 307029/12.

142 A.D.3d 918 (2016)

37 N.Y.S.3d 883

JOSEPH McMANUS, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided September 29, 2016.


Summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim was inappropriate, because questions of fact exist concerning whether a scaffold purportedly covering the opening of the flocculation tank through which plaintiff fell was a proper and adequate safety device (see Ortega v City of New York, 95 A.D.3d 125, 128 [1st Dept 2012]) and whether, if the scaffold was an adequate safety device, plaintiff removed the device by moving it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases