Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant preserved for appellate review his arguments regarding the validity of a search warrant by making these arguments in connection with that branch of his omnibus motion which was to controvert the warrant and to suppress physical evidence seized in the execution thereof (see CPL 470.05 [2]; 710.70 [2]; cf. People v Clarke,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.