1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 27 N.Y.3d
  5. 27 N.Y.3d 1144 (2016)
 

PEOPLE v. PANTON

No. 118.

27 N.Y.3d 1144 (2016)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NADINE PANTON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided June 30, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Dean , Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City ( Robin Nichinsky of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. , District Attorney, New York City ( David P. Stromes of counsel), and Robert T Johnson , District Attorney, Bronx ( Joseph N. Ferdenzi , Peter D. Coddington and T. Charles Won of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre-Miranda custodial interrogation and as a result, her post-Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpreserved for our...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases