The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. A warrant to search defendant's apartment, identified by address and apartment number, was sufficiently specific to authorize a search of the apartment's bathroom, notwithstanding that it was located across the hall from the apartment's main door. Defendant had a key to the bathroom at issue, to the exclusion of others, and his apartment had no other bathroom. Thus, the bathroom was part of the apartment for all relevant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
