1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 137 A.D.3d
  5. 137 A.D.3d 697 (2016)
 

BATTISTELLA v. JOYCE

310389/10, 659, 658.

137 A.D.3d 697 (2016)

27 N.Y.S.3d 376

2016 NY Slip Op 02519

MARCO BATTISTELLA, Appellant, v. MARNIE ANN JOYCE, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 31, 2016.

The record belies plaintiff's claim that he was not given sufficient opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses and to reserve arguments as to disclosure. Moreover, plaintiff had ample opportunity to review and digest the forensic evaluation report before trial. The record also shows that it was plaintiff's choice to proceed pro se (see Mastrandrea v Mastrandrea, 268 A.D.2d 293

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases