Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly held that the plaintiffs' causes of action alleging professional malpractice, negligence, and conversion were untimely brought (see CPLR 214 [3], [6]). Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the defendants were not equitably estopped from relying on the statute of limitations (see Putter v North Shore Univ. Hosp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.