SONKIN v. SONKIN

584, 304447/09.

137 A.D.3d 635 (2016)

28 N.Y.S.3d 361

2016 NY Slip Op 02145

STACY SONKIN, Respondent, v. PAUL SONKIN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 24, 2016.


Defendant failed to demonstrate the extreme hardship necessary to obtain modification of the maintenance obligations contained in the parties' stipulation of settlement, which was incorporated but not merged into the parties' divorce judgment (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b] [1]; Sheila C. v Donald C., 5 A.D.3d 123 [1st Dept 2004]). Nor did he demonstrate a substantial, unanticipated and unreasonable change...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases