Having dismissed the complaint as against defendants Akam Associates, Inc. and the Future Condominium on the ground that the condition over which plaintiff tripped in the hallway of her apartment building was an open, obvious and not inherently dangerous condition, the court erred in failing to dismiss the complaint as against defendants Edwards and Megson on the same ground (see Samantha R. v New York City Hous. Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SKISDOPOLUS v. EDWARDS
564, 103169/11.
137 A.D.3d 605 (2016)
26 N.Y.S.3d 702
2016 NY Slip Op 02030
DORIS SKISDOPOLUS, Respondent, v. JACQUELINE EDWARDS et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 22, 2016.
Decided March 22, 2016.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.