The Referee properly dismissed petitioner's motion to vacate the order of protection, because petitioner did not show good cause for such relief (see Family Ct Act §§ 841 [d]; 844). Petitioner, as movant, had the burden of establishing that her consent to the order of protection was not knowing and/or voluntary, in that it was given due to "fraud, collusion, mistake, accident, or some other similar ground" (Matter of Nori-Alyce Y. v Mark Y.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MAHMUDA U. v. MOHAMMED S.I.
486.
137 A.D.3d 534 (2016)
26 N.Y.S.3d 688
2016 NY Slip Op 01762
In the Matter of MAHMUDA U., Appellant, v. MOHAMMED S.I., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 15, 2016.
Decided March 15, 2016.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
