1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 135 A.D.3d
  5. 135 A.D.3d 656 (2016)
 

MAMOON v. DOT NET INC.

58 652902/13

135 A.D.3d 656 (2016)

25 N.Y.S.3d 85

2016 NY Slip Op 00600

NAZNEEN MAMOON, Also Known as NAZNEEN AHMED, Respondent, v. DOT NET INC. et al., Defendants, and MOSS & MOSS LLP et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 28, 2016.

The Moss defendants' contention that the complaint was merely verified by plaintiff's attorney is a red herring, as the complaint was not required to be verified at all (see Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 3020.09 [2d ed 2015]; see also Patrick M. Connors, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3020:3, C3020:5).

Although we do not condone the conduct of plaintiff's attorney, plaintiff should not be punished for her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases