Supreme Court incorrectly found that there was no rational basis for HPD's determination that petitioner failed to establish that there was "emotional and financial commitment and interdependence between [himself] and the tenant/cooperator" who had permanently vacated the subject apartment (see 28 RCNY 3-02 [p] [2] [ii] [B] [a], [b], [c], [d], [f], [g]). While there is record evidence that would support finding a family-like (nephew) relationship between petitioner...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.