Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of robbery in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt because the People failed to establish that he forcibly stole the complainant's property (see Penal Law §§ 160.00, 160.10). However, that issue is not preserved for appellate review, as he made only a general motion to dismiss at the close of the People's case (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.