The alleged defamatory statements by defendant's employees are shielded by the common interest privilege, which covers statements made in the context of plaintiff's job, regarding his alleged job-related misconduct (see Liberman v Gelstein,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ATKINS v. FLAT RATE MOVERS, LTD.
16276, 307301/11.
134 A.D.3d 437 (2015)
19 N.Y.S.3d 735
2015 NY Slip Op 08916
WARREN ATKINS, Respondent, v. FLAT RATE MOVERS, LTD., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 3, 2015.
Decided December 3, 2015.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.