The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress a cell phone recovered from his person at the time of his arrest. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations. Defendant's pattern of behavior, both before and after being stopped by the police, strongly indicated that he was a participant in his companion's fraudulent credit card purchase, and provided probable cause for defendant's arrest (see e.g. People v Arriaga,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. PETITHOMME
15707, 2355/11.
131 A.D.3d 877 (2015)
17 N.Y.S.3d 22
2015 NY Slip Op 06962
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOUIS PETITHOMME, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 29, 2015.
Decided September 29, 2015.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
