In this action to rescind a purchase agreement and recover a down payment, the proceeding before the Attorney General (AG) was sufficiently judicial so as to warrant preclusive effect (see Coffey v CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SAPPHIRE INVESTMENT VENTURES, LLC v. MARK HOTEL SPONSOR LLC
15157, 600905/10.
131 A.D.3d 821 (2015)
16 N.Y.S.3d 56
2015 NY Slip Op 06695
SAPPHIRE INVESTMENT VENTURES, LLC, Plaintiff, and RUBY INVESTMENT VENTURES, INC., Respondent, v. MARK HOTEL SPONSOR LLC et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided September 1, 2015.
Decided September 1, 2015.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.