Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction. The court correctly concluded that the defendant's challenge to the eyewitness evidence presented at trial was procedurally barred because that ground for relief had already been determined on the merits on the defendant's direct appeal to this Court (see People v Thomas,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.