Vasquez's cross motion seeking renewal and reconsideration is deemed a motion to reargue, since Vasquez did not point to any new fact that would change the prior determination (see Pullman v Silverman,
The motion court providently exercised its discretion in confirming the Referee's report, as the report is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.