BECKER v. PERLA

14360, 651575/13.

125 A.D.3d 575 (2015)

RONNY BECKER et al., Appellants, v. DANIEL PERLA et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 26, 2015.


Although plaintiffs concede that their lawyer represented some of the defendants in a prior matter, and that the parties' interests are now directly adverse, disqualification is not required. The present and prior matters are not substantially related, and plaintiff's attorney did not obtain confidential information from the defendants during the prior matter (see Tekni-Plex, Inc. v Meyner & Landis, 89 N.Y.2d 123, 131 [1996]...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases