Plaintiff demonstrated, by the requisite clear and convincing evidence, that it was entitled to reformation of the subject guaranty to correct the name of the borrower of the underlying loan (see Nash v Kornblum,
The testimony of the draftsperson and the loan documents, including the guaranty, which were executed on the same day, named a loan in the same amount, and applied to the same property,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.