Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We reject the defendant's contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the admission of testimony regarding his participation in a prior robbery. During defense counsel's cross-examination of a cooperating witness, he opened the door to a question about the defendant's involvement with that witness in that prior, otherwise unrelated, robbery (see People v Wisdom,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.