The affidavit of plaintiff's expert meteorologist was not sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the ice upon which plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell was a result of melting and refreezing of runoff created by defendant's snow-clearing activities. As Supreme Court found, the meteorologist's opinion offered by plaintiff was speculative. Plaintiff's expert did not refute the testimony of defendant's maintenance
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ACAR v. ECCLESIASTICAL ASSISTANCE CORP.
14177, 116515/10.
125 A.D.3d 464 (2015)
JOZEF ACAR, Appellant, v. ECCLESIASTICAL ASSISTANCE CORPORATION, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 10, 2015.
Decided February 10, 2015.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
