1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 124 A.D.3d
  5. 124 A.D.3d 874 (2015)
 

VANACORE v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.

2014-05601, Index No. 16440/11.

124 A.D.3d 874 (2015)

998 N.Y.S.2d 911

SUSAN VANACORE, Respondent, v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 28, 2015.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"In the absence of prejudice or surprise to the opposing party, leave to amend a pleading should be freely granted unless the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit" (Lauder v Goldhamer, 122 A.D.3d 908, 910 [2014]; see CPLR 3025 [b]; Postiglione v Castro, 119 A.D.3d 920, 922...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases