The order of protection is vacated because, even though it was properly entered upon respondent's failure to appear at the scheduled hearing, the Court of Appeals has since determined that the family offense of aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [1]), upon which this particular order of protection was based, "is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad" (People v Golb,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF ELIZABETH T. v. ANDREW T.
14079.
124 A.D.3d 556 (2015)
998 N.Y.S.2d 636
In the Matter of ELIZABETH T., Respondent, v. ANDREW T., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 29, 2015.
Decided January 29, 2015.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
