1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 124 A.D.3d
  5. 124 A.D.3d 539 (2015)
 

SOGOLOFF v. SOGOLOFF

14054, 350040/10.

124 A.D.3d 539 (2015)

HELEN SOGOLOFF, Respondent-Appellant, v. DIMITRI SOGOLOFF, Appellant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 26, 2015.

The Special Referee properly found that the Gallery QMS Fund was an "active" asset to be valued as of the date of the commencement of this action (see Greenwald v Greenwald, 164 A.D.2d 706, 716 [1st Dept 1991], lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 855 [1991]), since Horton Point, an entity owned and controlled by defendant, made all of the investment decisions regarding the fund (see Ferraioli v Ferraioli, 295 A.D.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases