Given that plaintiff entered into an additional agreement with defendant whereby defendant performed further renovation work for plaintiff on the units at issue, plaintiff waived his right to rescind the purchase agreement based on a previously disclosed error in the description of the condominium's real property (see New York Tel. Co. v Jamestown Tel. Corp., 282 N.Y. 365, 372 [1940]). This is particularly so where the new agreement
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
AKEROYD v. SOHO 311 DEV., INC.
14033, 103925/10.
124 A.D.3d 532 (2015)
SHANE AKEROYD, Respondent, v. SOHO 311 DEVELOPMENT, INC., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 26, 2015.
Decided January 26, 2015.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
