Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court violated his due process right to appear at his risk assessment hearing pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA; see Correction Law § 168-n [3]) when it conducted the hearing in his absence is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant's counsel, who represented him at the hearing, did not object to conducting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
