1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 123 A.D.3d
  5. 123 A.D.3d 637 (2014)
 

MATTER OF BRODSKY v. NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE BD.

13862, 118316/06

123 A.D.3d 637 (2014)

999 N.Y.S.2d 417

2014 NY Slip Op 09052

In the Matter of MERYL BRODSKY, Appellant, et al., Petitioners v. NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 30, 2014.

This Court has rejected petitioner's prior efforts pro se to vacate the underlying judgment, on the ground, among other things, that she has not been prejudiced by any technical defects in the judgment (see 80 A.D.3d 495 [1st Dept 2011]). Petitioner's renewed attempts to vacate the judgment and collaterally attack the prior ruling holding her personally liable for the repayments owed to respondent are barred by the doctrines of res...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases