PENNINGTON v. DA NICO RESTAURANT

13837 105103/11

123 A.D.3d 627 (2014)

2014 NY Slip Op 09034

1 N.Y.S.3d 26

BARBARA PENNINGTON, Appellant, v. DA NICO RESTAURANT, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 30, 2014.


Plaintiff's cross motion for an extension of time to serve Da Nico with the summons and complaint, pursuant to CPLR 306-b, should be granted in the interest of justice (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 N.Y.2d 95, 105-106 [2001]). The absence of due diligence on plaintiff's part is mitigated by the facts that Da Nico had timely notice of the claim; Da Nico had been timely, albeit defectively, served; plaintiff had communicated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases