RIEDEL v. KAPOOR

2013-02596

123 A.D.3d 996 (2014)

999 N.Y.S.2d 475

2014 NY Slip Op 08972

CATHERINE RIEDEL, Appellant, v. DEEPAK A. KAPOOR et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 24, 2014.


Ordered that the order entered January 24, 2013, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

CPLR 1021 requires a motion for substitution to be made within a reasonable time (see Reed v Grossi, 59 A.D.3d 509, 511 [2009]). The determination of reasonableness requires consideration of several factors, including the diligence of the party seeking substitution, the prejudice to the other parties, and whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases