1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 24 N.Y.3d
  5. 24 N.Y.3d 1185 (2014)
 

HELTZ v. BARRATT

Not in source

24 N.Y.3d 1185 (2014)

MARY T. HELTZ, Appellant, v. BRUCE S. BARRATT et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided December 17, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Personius Melber LLP, Buffalo ( Scott R. Hapeman of counel), for appellant.

Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo ( Andrew J. Kowalewski of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to produce admissible evidence raising a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendant Barratt had an opportunity to avoid the collision.

Concur: Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases