PEOPLE v. LUDWIG

No. 166

24 N.Y.3d 221 (2014)

21 N.E.3d 1012

997 N.Y.S.2d 351

2014 NY Slip Op 07201

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL A. LUDWIG, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided October 23, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLP, Rochester ( Brian Shiffrin of counsel), for appellant.

Sandra Doorley , District Attorney, Rochester ( Matthew Dunham and Geoffrey Kaeuper of counsel), for respondent.

Judges GRAFFEO, PIGOTT and ABDUS-SALAAM concur; Judge SMITH concurs in result in an opinion; Chief Judge LIPPMAN dissents in an opinion in which Judge RIVERA concurs.


OPINION OF THE COURT

In this child sexual abuse case, County Court permitted the People to elicit testimony about complainant's prior consistent statements disclosing the abuse, and precluded defendant's mother from testifying about a prior allegedly inconsistent statement made by complainant. We conclude that the trial judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases