While we recognize that a court has discretion to grant a modification of a sex offender classification, the court improvidently exercised such discretion in this case. Defendant failed to meet his burden under Correction Law § 168-o(2) of presenting clear and convincing evidence that a downward modification of his risk level is warranted.
Defendant's apparent sobriety while incarcerated and during the first 17 months after his release to parole supervision...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
