Ordered that the order entered June 15, 2012 is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs contend that a certain settlement agreement and release of the parties did not preclude them from seeking, in this action, an accounting that accrues after the date of the release, and thus, the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendants' cross motions for leave to renew and, upon renewal, granting their prior motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs' contentions are raised...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
