Ordered that the order is affirmed.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46. The defendant has a very extensive criminal history, which includes three felonies, 16 misdemeanors, and eight violations (see People v Vidal,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.