THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
CHURCHILL ANDREWS, Appellant.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
KEVIN KRUGER, Appellant.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v.
VINOD PATEL, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued April 29, 2014.
Decided June 12, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Lynn W.L. Fahey , Appellate Advocates, New York City ( Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled action.
Lynn W.L. Fahey , Appellate Advocates, New York City, for respondent in the third above-entitled action.
Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS-SALAAM concur with Judge GRAFFEO; Judge RIVERA in a separate concurring opinion.
Court of Appeals of New York.
OPINION OF THE COURT
GRAFFEO, J.
In these three cases, we consider whether our decision in People v Syville (15 N.Y.3d 391 [2010]) entitled defendants to a common-law writ of error coram nobis in order to pursue untimely appeals.
The appellate process is a statutory creation in New York (see e.g. People v Romero,7 N.Y.3d 633
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.