Family Court providently exercised its discretion in extending the father's time to serve process in the "interest of justice" (see CPLR 306-b). The court properly considered that the father had a meritorious cause of action, and that a denial of the extension request would extremely prejudice the father, who, due to the passing of time and the child's removal from New York by the mother, would no longer be able to invoke the jurisdiction of New York courts to obtain...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
