The determination that respondent sexually abused two of the subject children, and thereby derivatively neglected the four other subject children, is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). The out-of-court statements of sexual abuse made by respondent's daughter were corroborated by the medical evidence and testimony of her counselor (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [vi]; Matter of Estefania S. [Orlando S....
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
