1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 118 A.D.3d
  5. 118 A.D.3d 680 (2014)
 

MINEOLA AUTOMOTIVE, INC. v. MILLBROOK PROPS., LTD.

2013-02206, Index No. 7312/11.

118 A.D.3d 680 (2014)

986 N.Y.S.2d 354

2014 NY Slip Op 3989

MINEOLA AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Appellant, v. MILLBROOK PROPERTIES, LTD., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 4, 2014.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

"Whether to disqualify an attorney is a matter which lies within the sound discretion of the court" (Matter of Madris v Oliviera, 97 A.D.3d 823, 825 [2012]). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion to disqualify the plaintiff's attorney, "considering the settled principle that doubts as to the existence of a conflict of interest

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases