While plaintiff is correct that separate writings can be considered together when they evince an intent to forward the same transaction or purpose (see Nau v Vulcan Rail & Constr. Co., 286 N.Y. 188, 197 [1941]), that does not avail it, since two of the written agreements at issue expressly contradict the overarching purpose it seeks to establish through parol evidence (see Crabtree v Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DRAGON HEAD LLC v. ELKMAN
12648, 650192/12.
118 A.D.3d 424 (2014)
987 N.Y.S.2d 60
2014 NY Slip Op 3957
DRAGON HEAD LLC, Appellant, v. STEVEN MUNRO ELKMAN et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 3, 2014.
Decided June 3, 2014.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
