GOLDEN v. CITIBANK, N.A.

No. 71.

23 N.Y.3d 935 (2014)

2014 NY Slip Op 3192

RICHARD N. GOLDEN, Respondent, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided May 6, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP, New York City ( Barry J. Glickman and Bruce S. Goodman of counsel), for appellant.

Richard N. Golden, Forest Hills, respondent pro se.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

A cashier's check — essentially, a check drawn by a bank on itself — is presumed to have been issued for value, and the issuance of such a check constitutes an acceptance by the issuing bank, which gives rise to an obligation to pay (see Dziurak v Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., 44 N.Y.2d 776

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases