While the court mistakenly referred to plaintiff's motion as a motion to reargue, it was essentially treated as a motion for renewal. In general, motions for renewal should be based on "newly discovered facts that could not be offered on the prior motion" (Mejia v Nanni,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.