Plaintiff was a limited purpose public figure, and therefore, to prevail on her claim of defamation, was required to show by clear and convincing evidence that defendants published the statements at issue with actual malice (see Huggins v Moore,
Let's get started
![Leagle.com](https://www.leagle.com/images/logo.png)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.