Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants to recover damages for architectural malpractice and breach of contract. In a conditional order of preclusion dated August 3, 2011, the Supreme Court, inter alia, directed that all depositions were to be completed, and all discovery responses were to be served, by September 15, 2011. The order precluded the parties from offering evidence at trial with respect...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
