Substantial evidence supports the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant, a security guard, lost his employment due to disqualifying misconduct and was ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits. The Board credited testimony that claimant was terminated after he repeatedly used his personal cell phone while he was working, despite warnings not to (see Matter of Dzaba [Commissioner of Labor],
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF CLAIM OF BALAY
516573.
111 A.D.3d 1016 (2013)
974 N.Y.S.2d 307
2013 NY Slip Op 7243
In the Matter of the Claim of KIRK BALAY, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 7, 2013.
Decided November 7, 2013.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.