SATO v. IPPUDO NY

No. 246 SSM 19.

21 N.Y.3d 1059 (2013)

996 N.E.2d 910

974 N.Y.S.2d 29

2013 NY Slip Op 5849

HIDEKI SATO et al., Appellants, v. IPPUDO NY et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided September 12, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York City ( Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellants.

Molod Spitz & DeSantis, P.C., New York City ( Marcy Sonneborn of counsel), for respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS-SALAAM.


OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendants' alleged negligence in failing to provide adequate warning of the presence of the staircase or adequate lighting in the staircase and surrounding area caused...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases