1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 21 N.Y.3d
  5. 21 N.Y.3d 1022 (2013)
 

MATTER OF LACORTE v. CYTRYN

No. 240.

21 N.Y.3d 1022 (2013)

In the Matter of DAGAN LACORTE, Appellant, v. HOWARD L. CYTRYN et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent. (And Another Proceeding.)

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided August 22, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, LLP, New York City ( Jerry H. Goldfeder of counsel), for appellant.

Alan Goldston , Scarsdale, for Howard L. Cytryn and others, respondents.

Jeffrey J. Fortunato , County Attorney, New City ( Thomas M. Mascola of counsel), for Rockland County Board of Elections, respondent.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS-SALAAM concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The Appellate Division properly determined that the validating petition did not sufficiently specify which determinations of the Board petitioner claimed were erroneous (see Matter of Krueger v Richards, 59 N.Y.2d 680, 682 [1983]).

Order affirmed, without costs, in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases